Reflections by the Commander
in Chief
AZNAR’S
SILENCE
During a Round Table program aired on Cuban television on
April 25, 2003, I pointed out that the then Spanish President José María Aznar,
an ally of the world's leader in genocides and massacres, had met with
President William Clinton on April 13, 1999, at an uncertain juncture of the
war in
"If we’re at war, let’s make it an all-out war, in
order to win, to achieve more than a partial victory. Even if the war must last
a month, three months, let's wage it. I don't understand why we have not yet
bombed Serbian radio and television".
Aznar and
[...]
"AZNAR:
I will speak frankly. As I've already told President Clinton, the one thing
that cannot happen is for NATO to be defeated now. Not only NATO's credibility,
but its very existence as well, is now at stake. Had this conflict taken place
30 years ago, we would not have intervened.
Referring
to Chirac, the French president, he said: "I will speak with him tomorrow
in
"My
idea is that, in order to win the war, the lines of communication between the
“In
addition to this, we must restructure our information policy. NATO's
information policy is disastrous. We're giving people the impression we've set
out on an adventure, not that we're waging a war. There are real communication
gaps. We have to go as far as we can on this, patiently cut off all supplies
and lines of communication.
“We
have to be careful with
"We
must step up humanitarian aid efforts. Our citizens must see the efficacy of
our humanitarian work as the other side of the bombings.
"It
would be senseless to change positions now. I spoke with Annan yesterday. I saw
that he had a firm stance on the matter. I stressed this to Annan. We can be flexible, but we cannot
give people the impression that NATO is withdrawing.
"We
can be flexible with respect to whether NATO would lead this force or not, but
we cannot content ourselves with having OSCE (Organization for Security and
Co-operation in
"We
must continue to pursue this strategy, to see if it possible for him to be
overthrown internally" (He is referring to Serbian President Slobodan
Milosevic).
"If
a number of his generals fear that they can be accused before the Hague
Tribunal, they may cooperate. Milosevic will likely try and come to an agreement.
We must attempt to have that agreement reduce and not increase his power.
"We
need not even touch on the matter of the land operation.
"Everyone
understands that plans are in the making, anything else would be illogical. If
our current strategy isn't working, we have to explore other options. It must
be put on the table for consideration. If everything we're doing leads us
nowhere, we'll have to intervene in the coming months. But our actions could
not be limited to Kosovo. Rather, they would include other areas of the
"If
they have no guarantee of a Serbian presence in the regions that symbolize the
birth of their civilization for them, they won't accept it. The feeling that
native soil has been lost, that this soil must be "liberated", will
arise.
"Our
priority is to win the war; we'll see what happens afterwards".
[…]
I ask Mr. Aznar to tell us
whether it is true or not that, on April 13, 1999, he advised President Clinton
to bomb Serbian radio and television.
Fidel Castro Ruz
September 29, 2007
8:36 p.m.