Reflections
by Comrade Fidel
THE
EMPIRE FROM THE INSIDE
(PART THREE)
CHAPTER
15
Admiral
Mullen appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee for his
confirmation hearing heading towards a second two-year term, two days after the
first session dedicated to the strategy. In his statement, the admiral
refers to the strategy suggested by McChrystal and he
adds that this “probably means more forces”.
When Obama
heard about Mullen’s testimony, he let his staff know how unhappy he was knowing that Mullen was publicly endorsing McChrystal’s strategy. The admiral stated that “The
Taliban insurgency grows in both size and complexity”, and that was why he
was supporting a properly resourced, classically pursued counterinsurgency efforts. Had Mullen ignored
what Obama said just two days earlier? Had the President
not told everyone, including Mullen, that none of the
options looked good, that they needed to challenge their assumptions, and they were
going to have four or five long sessions for debate? What was the
president’s principal military adviser doing, going public with his preventive conclusions?
At the meeting of the
principal members of the National Security Council it was clear that they were
furious. The generals and admirals are systematically playing him, boxing
him.
Emmanuel commented that what
was going on between the admiral and Petraeus was not
right, that everyone had publicly supported the idea that more troops needed to
be sent. The president didn’t even had a chance.
Morrell realized that Mullen
could have ducked the controversy at his hearing by merely saying that his job
was to be the principal military adviser to the president of the United States
and secretary of the defence, and that he was to present his recommendations to
them first in private before stating them publicly and that he didn’t consider
it to be proper to share them before the Committee.
Morrell thought this was all
part of Mullen’s compulsion to communicate, to enhance the prominene
and stature of his position. He had a Facebook
page, a Twitter account, videos on YouTube
and a Web site called “Travels with Mullen: Conversation with the
Country”.
As he left the lobby, Mullen
himself discovered that it was he who was the topic of a heated powwow.
Emmanuel and Donilon asked him: How are we supposed to deal with
this? You did this, and what should we say?
Emmanuel added that this was
going to be the lead storied in all the evening news.
Mullen was
surprised. The White House knew in advance what he was going to say, but
in his testimony he hadn’t given any specific numbers for troops. He was
as fuzzy as he could be. But at his confirmation hearing he had to say the
truth and the truth was that he was sharing the idea about the need for counterinsurgency. “That’s
what I think”, he said. What was his alternative?
Donilon was wondering why
Mullen had had to use the word ‘probably’, and why he hadn’t said ‘I don’t
know’. That would have been better.
The headline on the Washington Post’s frontpage
the next morning read: “Mullen: More Troops ‘Probably’ Needed”.
Obama summoned the
retired General Collin Powell to a private meeting in the Oval Office on
September 16. Powell had given Obama an
important endorsement during his campaign.
Referring to
He also recommended not to
get pushed by the media, to take his time, get all the information he needed to
ensure that afterwards he was going to feel comfortable with his
decision.
“If you decide to send more
troops or if that´s what you feel
is necessary, make sure you have a good understanding what those troops
are going to be doing some assurance that
additional troops will be successful. You can’t guarantee success in a very complex theatre like
“You’ve got to ensure that you’re
putting your commitment on a solid base, because at the base is a
little soft right now.”, Powell said, referring to Karzai
and the generalized corruption existing in his government.
The president wasn’t fully
backing a counterinsurgency operation because that meant assuming the
responsibility for
The president said that when
he received McChrystal’s assessment it was evident
that everyone had to get together in a room to ensure that everyone was on the
same page.
CHAPTER
16
On September 29, Jones assembled
the princials of the National Security Council for a
two-hour discussion as a rehearsal for the meeting the next day, without the
president.
Anyone who would have watched
a video of the meeting would probably be alarmed. Eight years after
starting the war, they were still struggling to define what the core of the objectives were.
Biden had written a
six-page memo exclusively for the president, questioning the intelligence
reports on the Taliban. The reports portrayed the Taliban as the new Al
Qaeda. Because the Taliban who had fought against the Americans, it had
become common for the Arabs, Uzbeks, Tayiks and
Chechens to cross over towards
Biden pointed out that
these numbers were exaggerated, that the number of foreign combatants did not
surpass 50 to 75 each time.
On Wednesday September 30th,
the president held the second meeting to analyze the problem of
The president asked: “Is
there anybody here who thinks we ought to leave
“Okay”, the president said,
“now that we’ve dispensed with, let’s get on.”
Obama also wanted to steer
away from the
“Let’s start where our
interests take us, which is really
Obama set the rules for
the rest of the session. “I really want to focus on the issue of the
Lavoy and Petraeus spoke. MacChrystal gave
a presentation about what he called “The Pathway” towards his initial
assessment.
Obama stated: “Okay.
You guys have done your job, but there are three developments since them. The
Pakistanis are doing better; the
Biden was favouring the
assumption, contested by the president, that
Robert Gates proposed keeping
in mind the interests abroad and the allies.
Towards the end of the
meeting, Hillary asked how the additional troops would be used, where they
would be sent, if they were going as advisors and how the lessons learned in
The intelligence analyses at
the most senior level were never conclusive about action in
Gates met with Haqqani, the Pakistani ambassador in the
CHAPTER
17
Obama met with a
bipartisan group of about 30 congressional leaders to update them on the
strategy review.
A number of legislators criticized
the counterterrorism approach that Biden had been
advocating. They interpreted it as a way of reducing the
Biden made it clear
that he wasn’t defending a policy that would imply an operation carried out
only with the use of Special Troops.
The president had to make it
clear that nobody was talking about abandoning
McCain said he was only
hoping that the decision was not being made leisurely and that he respected the
fact that Obama, as the commander in chief, had to
make the decision.
Obama responded to him:
“I can assure you that I’m not making this decision in a leisurely way.
And you’re absolutely right. This is my decision, and I’m the commander
in chief.”
Obama continued by
saying: “Nobody feels more urgency to make this decision –but to make it right
– than I do”.
That same day, at 3:30 in the
afternoon, Obama again called his group together for
a meeting to analyze the
The consensus within the
intelligence community was that the situation in
Mullen pointed out that the
collaboration programs between the
There were suggestions to
open up new facilities in
Obama approved all the
actions in the field. It was rare to receive an immediate order from the
president since up to that time there was a lot of talk at the sessions and not
much decision-making.
CHAPTER
18
At last McChrystal
had his chance to present his option for the troop increase alone before the
principals (Obama was not present) on October
8th.
The essence of his
presentation, along with 14 slides, was that conditions in
Jones said that there were
still some unanswered questions and he jotted down in his notebook that it was
impossible to put any strategy for
McChrystal listed
three options:
McChrystal made it clear
that the aim in this case was not to defeat the Taliban but to wear it down, in
other words, prevent them from taking control again of the key parts of the
country.
Hillary asked whether it was
possible to carry out a mission to degrade them down with fewer troops, and the
general answered that it wasn’t, that he was advocating the 40,000 man
option.
The next day, Obama awoke to the news
that he had received the Nobel Peace Prize.
The same afternoon at 2:30,
the National Security Council plenary had a work session with the
president. Obama began the meeting asking them
all to tell him what should be done with the war.
Lavoy started talking
about
McChrystal
said that unless the mission would change, he was presenting the same
options.
Eikenberry took 10 minutes
to summarize his options; they were rather pessimistic ones. He agreed
that the situation was getting worse and that it was necessary to send more
resources, but he thought that the counterinsurgent offensive was too
ambitious.
Gates reminded them that
everyone had embraced only three options:
But evidently there were more
options and not just those three. Gates added that it was necessary to
redefine the objective and that probably the
Petraeus concluded: “We
are not going to defeat the Taliban, but we do need to deny them access to key
population areas and lines of communication to “contain” them.
Biden asked:” What’s
the best-guess estimate for getting things headed in the right
direction? If a year from now is no demostrable
progress in governance, what do we do?
No answer.
Biden tried again: “If
the government doesn’t improve and if you get the troops, in a year, what would
be the impact?
Eikenberry answered that if
indeed the last five years had not been heartening, there had been small
progress, and they had been able to capitalize on it, but that they shouldn’t
expect significant forward movement in the next six to twelve months.
CHAPTER
19
It was Hillary’s turn at the
October 9th meeting. Hillary said that the dilemma was to decide
which came first, more troops or a better government; that in order to avoid
collapse more troops were needed, but that that would not ensure
progress.
She asked if it were possible
to achieve the objectives in
She added that all the
options were difficult and unsatisfactory and added: “We do have a national
security interest in ensuring the Taliban doesn’t defeat us. The same with destroying al Qaeda, which would be difficult without
Mullen echoed the other hawkish
comments. Dennis Blair suggested that domestic politics might be a problem
due to the number of casualties, since in the past month the figure had gone up
to 40, double the rate of the year before. He was wondering whether it
would be worth it. The answer was that the people would support it as
long as they believed there had been gains.
He said: “For the first time,
the president would have a strategy developed by his full war cabinet, and
we’ll be able to tell the American people what we are doing”.
Panetta’s opinion was: “You can’t leave. You can’t defeat the
Taliban. They were not talking about a Jeffersonian
democracy in
Susan Rice said she hadn`t made a decision but was thinking it was necessary to
reinforce security in
Holbrooke said that they
needed more troops and the problem was to know how many and how to use them.
John Brennan was asking what
it was that they wanted to achieve since the decisions on security matters that
would be adopted here would also be applied in other regions. If it was a
matter of a non-corrupt government, that wouldn`t be
achieved in his lifetime. “That’s why”, he was saying, “using terminology
like ‘success’, ‘victory’ and ‘win’ complicates our task”.
Two and a half hours had gone
by. The president said that those meetings had resulted in a useful
definition of the problem, that a new definition was
emerging.
“We won’t resolve this
today”, said Obama. “We’ve recognized that
we’re not going to completely defeat the Taliban”.
Obama said that if he
approved sending 40,000 troops that would not be enough for a counterinsurgency
strategy that would cover the entire country.
Obama was asking
whether it was possible to get the Afghans to the point where the
“We can’t sustain a
commitment indefinitely in the
Holbrooke returned to his
office in the State Department where the personnel was complaining that they
were staying up all night long writing analyses that nobody was reading.
Holbrooke answered that the
person to whom they were being addressed did read them, that the sleepless
nights hadn’t been in vain and that they should prepare a new reports package
for the president.
Thus concludes the
summary of Chapters 15 to 19 of the 33 chapters in “Obama’s
Wars”.
Yesterday, almost
at the same time, the publication of another book, Conversations with Myself, with a prologue by Barack
Obama, was announced. But this time, the
edition will come out in 20 languages. According to statements, it has the
important letters and documents from the life of its author, our well-known and
esteemed friend Nelson Mandela.
In the final years
of his cruel imprisonment, the United States converted the evil apartheid
regime into a nuclear power, providing it with more than half a dozen nuclear
bombs, destined to strike at the internationalist Cubans in order to impede
their advance into territory occupied by South Africa in Namibia. The
crushing defeat of the armies of apartheid in southern
Our
representatives in
To be continued
tomorrow.
Fidel Castro Ruz
October 12, 2010
7:12 p.m.